OpenChainBench

GetBlock vs RouteMesh

GetBlock leads on all 7 live benchmarks. GetBlock wins on Ethereum RPC endpoints (27 ms vs 120 ms), Arbitrum RPC endpoints (25 ms vs 196 ms), Base RPC endpoints (24 ms vs 189 ms), BNB Chain RPC endpoints (26 ms vs 126 ms). Data as of 2026-10-29 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h7 shared benchmarks
GetBlock logo
GetBlock

Multi-chain RPC provider covering 130+ networks, billed in Compute Units. Keyed JSON-RPC runs on shared nodes with the serving region selectable between New York, Frankfurt and Singapore. Cost is a chain multiplier times a method multiplier, with archive priced from an independent column rather than as a fixed surcharge.

RO
RouteMesh

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

GetBlock vs RouteMesh: which one is better?

GetBlock and RouteMesh are compared on 7 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. GetBlock leads on Ethereum RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, GetBlock or RouteMesh?

On the Ethereum RPC endpoints benchmark, GetBlock leads at 27 ms versus RouteMesh at 120 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the GetBlock vs RouteMesh comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.