GMGN vs Phantom

Name: GMGN vs Phantom OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

GMGN leads on the only live benchmark. GMGN wins on Average swap size on Solana ($98.99 vs $51.08).

Read methodology Last measured Thu, 13 Aug 2026 22:40:13 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

GMGN

GMGN is a Solana and EVM memecoin trading terminal combining wallet tracking, smart money copy trading and a Telegram bot. It routes swaps through pump.fun and DEX pools with a configurable slippage and fee.

Phantom

Side by side measurements

Average swap size on Solana: pump.fun vs GMGN vs Fomo vs Axiom, live

Trading

GMGN

Leads

$98.99

p99: $98.99
rank: #2
samples: 1,325,690

Phantom

Trails

$51.08

p99: $51.08
rank: #8
samples: 147,385

Average swap size is computed as 24h attributed volume divided by 24h attributed trade count from Mobula lighthouse. Both numerator and denominator include bot and MEV activity; the metric reflects all on-chain swaps attributed to each platform, not human-only trades. pump.fun volume comes from the byLaunchpad bucket (bonding-curve swaps via pump.fun's own frontend); all other platforms come from byPlatform. Attribution is mutually exclusive per Mobula's referral-tag methodology.

Frequently asked questions

GMGN vs Phantom: which one is better?

GMGN and Phantom are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. GMGN leads on Average swap size on Solana. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, GMGN or Phantom?

On the Average swap size on Solana benchmark, GMGN leads at $98.99 versus Phantom at $51.08. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the GMGN vs Phantom comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.