Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingGMX V2
Trails$184.54M
- p99
- $252.04M
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 2,879
Pacifica
Leads$767.14M
- p99
- $1.03B
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 2,879
GMX V2 vs Pacifica
Pacifica leads on both live benchmarks. Pacifica wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($767.14M vs $184.54M), Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($767.14M vs $184.54M).
GV
Pacifica
Solana perp DEX optimized for high-frequency trading, oracle-anchored funding.
Side by side measurements
Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingGMX V2
Trails$184.54M
- p99
- $252.04M
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 2,879
Pacifica
Leads$767.14M
- p99
- $1.03B
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 2,879
Frequently asked questions
GMX V2 vs Pacifica: which one is better?
GMX V2 and Pacifica are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Pacifica leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is cheaper, GMX V2 or Pacifica?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Pacifica leads at $767.14M versus GMX V2 at $184.54M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the GMX V2 vs Pacifica comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.