Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingGMX V2
Leads$135.78M
- p99
- $164.74M
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 2,880
SynFutures
Trails$80.82M
- p99
- $91.75M
- rank
- —
- samples
- 2,880
GMX V2 vs SynFutures
GMX V2 leads on the only live benchmark. GMX V2 wins on Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($135.78M vs $80.82M).
GV
SynFutures
SynFutures is an oAMM-based (Oyster AMM) perpetuals DEX on Base and Arbitrum. Traders open positions against a concentrated liquidity pool rather than a matching engine; any ERC-20 can be listed permissionlessly.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
GMX V2 vs SynFutures: which one is better?
GMX V2 and SynFutures are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. GMX V2 leads on Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is cheaper, GMX V2 or SynFutures?
On the Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, GMX V2 leads at $135.78M versus SynFutures at $80.82M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the GMX V2 vs SynFutures comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.