GMX vs Ostium

GMX leads on 1 of 3 shared benchmarks, Ostium on 2. GMX wins on Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($77.72M vs $4.26M). Ostium wins on Perp DEX asset breadth (74 vs 8), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.357x vs 3.05x). Data as of 2026-09-23 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks, 3 measured on both sides
GMX logo
GMX

Perp DEX on Arbitrum and Avalanche. Pool-based execution against GLP and GM vaults, oracle-priced trades with no orderbook.

Ostium logo
Ostium

Arbitrum-based perp DEX specialized in RWA exposure including FX, commodities and indices.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

GMX

Trails

8

p99
8
rank
#13
samples
2,876

Ostium

Leads

74

p99
74
rank
#7
samples
2,876
Non-crypto markets
GMXn/aOstiumn/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Perp DEX price to fees ratio 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, GNS live

Trading
ProviderFees 30dRevenue 30dOpen interestFees / OI
GMX$4.45M$1.28M$25.38M2.13x
Ostium$126.4K$36.0K$6.42M0.240x
View
GMXn/aOstiumn/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

GMX

Trails

3.05x

p99
3.94x
rank
#17
samples
2,876

Ostium

Leads

0.357x

p99
0.574x
rank
#2
samples
2,876
Volume / OI (24h)
GMXn/aOstiumn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

GMX vs Ostium: which one is better?

GMX and Ostium are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. GMX leads on Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked. Ostium leads on Perp DEX asset breadth. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, GMX or Ostium?

On the Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, GMX leads at $77.72M versus Ostium at $4.26M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the higher non-crypto markets, GMX or Ostium?

On the Perp DEX asset breadth benchmark, Ostium leads at 74 versus GMX at 8. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the GMX vs Ostium comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.