GMX vs Paradex

Paradex leads on all 3 live benchmarks. Paradex wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.038% vs 0.060%), Perp DEX mark price fidelity (0.074% vs 0.075%), Perp DEX security track record (1,053 vs 406).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
GMX logo
GMX

Perp DEX on Arbitrum and Avalanche. Pool-based execution against GLP and GM vaults, oracle-priced trades with no orderbook.

Paradex logo
Paradex

Paradex is a perps-focused L2 exchange built on Starknet tech, with USD-settled perpetuals and funding accrued continuously over an 8 hour period.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX security track record: days without a recorded exploit, live

Trading

GMX

Trails

406

p99
406
rank
#6
samples
2,385

Paradex

Leads

1,053

p99
1,053
rank
#4
samples
2,385

This benchmark counts recorded incidents only. Absence from the registry does not prove a protocol is exploit-free: it means no incident matching the criteria (direct theft or loss of user funds via a security vulnerability) has been documented in the tracked sources as of the registry timestamp shown on each row. The registry is human-curated and updated when a new incident is confirmed. The registry date and source links are embedded in the harness.

Rolling 24h · Days since last exploitRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

GMX vs Paradex: which one is better?

GMX and Paradex are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Paradex leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, GMX or Paradex?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Paradex leads at 0.038% versus GMX at 0.060%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the GMX vs Paradex comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.