Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL
Trading| Provider | All-in cost | All-in at $100k | All-in at $1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| GMX | 0.060% | 0.060% | 0.060% |
| Paradex | 0.038% | 1.77% | 0.95% |
Paradex leads on all 3 live benchmarks. Paradex wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.038% vs 0.060%), Perp DEX mark price fidelity (0.074% vs 0.075%), Perp DEX security track record (1,053 vs 406).
Perp DEX on Arbitrum and Avalanche. Pool-based execution against GLP and GM vaults, oracle-priced trades with no orderbook.
Paradex is a perps-focused L2 exchange built on Starknet tech, with USD-settled perpetuals and funding accrued continuously over an 8 hour period.
| Provider | All-in cost | All-in at $100k | All-in at $1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| GMX | 0.060% | 0.060% | 0.060% |
| Paradex | 0.038% | 1.77% | 0.95% |
GMX
Trails0.075 %
Paradex
Leads0.074 %
Per chain
| Chain | GMX | Paradex |
|---|---|---|
| ETH | 0.074% | 0.072% |
| BTC | 0.075% | 0.074% |
| SOL | 0.077% | 0.072% |
GMX
Trails406
Paradex
Leads1,053
This benchmark counts recorded incidents only. Absence from the registry does not prove a protocol is exploit-free: it means no incident matching the criteria (direct theft or loss of user funds via a security vulnerability) has been documented in the tracked sources as of the registry timestamp shown on each row. The registry is human-curated and updated when a new incident is confirmed. The registry date and source links are embedded in the harness.
GMX
No data in window
Paradex
Trails0.14 %
GMX and Paradex are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Paradex leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Paradex leads at 0.038% versus GMX at 0.060%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.