GRVT vs Pacifica

GRVT leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Pacifica on 1. GRVT wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (194 vs 78), Perp DEX capital efficiency (6 vs 3). Pacifica wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($1.03B vs $580.39M).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
GRVT logo
GRVT

zkSync hybrid CEX/DEX perp venue with privacy-preserving order matching.

Pacifica logo
Pacifica

Solana perp DEX optimized for high-frequency trading, oracle-anchored funding.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

GRVT

Leads

6

p99
6
rank
#4
samples
2,880

Pacifica

Trails

3

p99
3
rank
#6
samples
2,880
Markets per $M TVL
GRVTn/aPacifican/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

GRVT vs Pacifica: which one is better?

GRVT and Pacifica are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. GRVT leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. Pacifica leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher active markets, GRVT or Pacifica?

On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, GRVT leads at 194 versus Pacifica at 78. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, GRVT or Pacifica?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Pacifica leads at $1.03B versus GRVT at $580.39M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the GRVT vs Pacifica comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.