GRVT vs Paradex

GRVT leads on all 3 live benchmarks. GRVT wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($583.49M vs $20.53M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (194 vs 63), Perp DEX capital efficiency (6 vs 3).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
GRVT logo
GRVT

zkSync hybrid CEX/DEX perp venue with privacy-preserving order matching.

Paradex logo
Paradex

Paradex is a perps-focused L2 exchange built on Starknet tech, with USD-settled perpetuals and funding accrued continuously over an 8 hour period.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

GRVT

Leads

6

p99
6
rank
#4
samples
2,880

Paradex

Trails

3

p99
3
rank
#7
samples
2,880
Markets per $M TVL
GRVTn/aParadexn/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

GRVT vs Paradex: which one is better?

GRVT and Paradex are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. GRVT leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, GRVT or Paradex?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, GRVT leads at $583.49M versus Paradex at $20.53M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the GRVT vs Paradex comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.