Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesInk
Trails7.50 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 32provisional
Linea
No data in window
VAA finalization
Inkn/aLinean/a
Ink vs Linea
Ink leads on both live benchmarks. Ink wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (56.25 s vs 3.0 min), Bridged TVL by chain ($369.36M vs $338.91M). Data as of 2026-10-24 UTC.
Linea
ConsenSys zkEVM rollup with a prover-bound block cadence. Idle periods batch into longer intervals (p50 around 3-6 s) while busy periods produce blocks closer to the nominal 2 s mark.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesInk
Trails24.6 min
- rank
- #12
- samples
- 40provisional
Linea
No data in window
CCIP delivery
Inkn/aLinean/a
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesInk
Leads56.25 s
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 7provisional
Linea
Trails3.0 min
- rank
- #14
- samples
- 12provisional
LayerZero delivery
Inkn/aLinean/a
Bridged TVL by chain: how much of a chain's capital came from somewhere else
Blockchains| Provider | Bridged TVL | Bridged share | 7d change | 7d vs peers | Native | Canonical | External |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ink | $369.36M | 100.0% | - | 0.50% | - | $53.87M | $313.89M |
| Linea | $338.91M | 99.6% | - | - | $1.50M | $120.45M | $216.02M |
View
Inkn/aLinean/a
Bridged TVL is value secured by the chain's bridge, not value locked in its DeFi protocols; a chain can rank high on one and low on the other. The split is L2Beat's: canonical is escrowed on the host chain by the chain's own contracts, external came through a third-party bridge, native was minted here. Rows are the chains L2Beat tracks in its scaling summary; a settled L1 has no row by construction, not by omission. Size is not quality: a large balance says capital came, not that it stayed.
Frequently asked questions
Ink vs Linea: which one is better?
Ink and Linea are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ink leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Ink or Linea?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Ink leads at 56.25 s (provisional) versus Linea at 3.0 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Ink vs Linea comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.