OpenChainBench

Ink vs Linea

Ink leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks, Linea on 0. Ink wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (48.75 s vs 230.00 s), Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery (10.72 s vs 90.00 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Ink logo
Ink
Linea logo
Linea

ConsenSys zkEVM rollup with a prover-bound block cadence. Idle periods batch into longer intervals (p50 around 3-6 s) while busy periods produce blocks closer to the nominal 2 s mark.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Ink vs Linea: which one is better?

Ink and Linea are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ink leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest layerzero source chain by end-to-end message delivery, Ink or Linea?

On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Ink leads at 48.75 s versus Linea at 230.00 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Ink vs Linea comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.