Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesInk
Trails7.50 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 7provisional
Linea
No data in window
Ink vs Linea
Ink leads on the only live benchmark. Ink wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (43.93 s vs 3.0 min).
Linea
ConsenSys zkEVM rollup with a prover-bound block cadence. Idle periods batch into longer intervals (p50 around 3-6 s) while busy periods produce blocks closer to the nominal 2 s mark.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesInk
Trails22.7 min
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 16provisional
Linea
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesInk
Leads43.93 s
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 27provisional
Linea
Trails3.0 min
- rank
- #16
- samples
- 50provisional
Frequently asked questions
Ink vs Linea: which one is better?
Ink and Linea are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ink leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Ink or Linea?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Ink leads at 43.93 s (provisional) versus Linea at 3.0 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Ink vs Linea comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.