OpenChainBench

Ink vs Mantle

Ink leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Mantle on 0. Ink wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (48.75 s vs 98.57 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Ink logo
Ink
Mantle logo
Mantle

Modular OP Stack fork using EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum calldata, cutting L1 anchoring cost. 2-second sequencer block time, MNT token for gas (ETH-pegged).

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Ink vs Mantle: which one is better?

Ink and Mantle are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ink leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest layerzero source chain by end-to-end message delivery, Ink or Mantle?

On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Ink leads at 48.75 s versus Mantle at 98.57 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Ink vs Mantle comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.