Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesInk
Trails7.50 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 7provisional
Mantle
No data in window
Ink vs Mantle
Split decision: Ink leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (43.93 s vs 59.17 s); Mantle leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (20.0 min vs 22.7 min).
Mantle
Modular OP Stack fork using EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum calldata, cutting L1 anchoring cost. 2-second sequencer block time, MNT token for gas (ETH-pegged).
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesInk
Trails22.7 min
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 16provisional
Mantle
Leads20.0 min
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 4provisional
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesInk
Leads43.93 s
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 27provisional
Mantle
Trails59.17 s
- rank
- #12
- samples
- 35provisional
Frequently asked questions
Ink vs Mantle: which one is better?
Ink and Mantle are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ink leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. Mantle leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Ink or Mantle?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Ink leads at 43.93 s (provisional) versus Mantle at 59.17 s (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster, Ink or Mantle?
On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Mantle leads at 20.0 min (provisional) versus Ink at 22.7 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Ink vs Mantle comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.