Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesInk
Trails10.00 s
- p99
- 14.90 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 2
Monad
Leads4.06 s
- p99
- 9.82 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 22
Ink vs Monad
Ink leads on 0 of 2 shared benchmarks, Monad on 2. Monad wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (4.06 s vs 10.00 s), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (23.00 s vs 48.75 s).
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesInk
No data in window
Monad
Trails90.00 min
- p99
- 119.40 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 2
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesInk
Trails48.75 s
- p99
- 59.78 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 3
Monad
Leads23.00 s
- p99
- 1119.02 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 54
Frequently asked questions
Ink vs Monad: which one is better?
Ink and Monad are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Monad leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Ink or Monad?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Monad leads at 4.06 s versus Ink at 10.00 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Ink vs Monad comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.