Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesInk
Trails10.00 s
- p99
- 14.90 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 2
Polygon
Leads7.42 s
- p99
- 14.68 s
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 191
Ink vs Polygon
Ink leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Polygon on 1. Ink wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (48.75 s vs 111.95 s), Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery (10.72 s vs 13.05 s). Polygon wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (7.42 s vs 10.00 s).
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesInk
No data in window
Polygon
Trails750.00 min
- p99
- 897.00 s
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 1
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesInk
Leads48.75 s
- p99
- 59.78 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 3
Polygon
Trails111.95 min
- p99
- 1091.00 s
- rank
- #13
- samples
- 109
Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesInk
Leads10.72 s
- p99
- 28.80 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 8
Polygon
Trails13.05 s
- p99
- 29.57 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 47
Frequently asked questions
Ink vs Polygon: which one is better?
Ink and Polygon are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ink leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. Polygon leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest layerzero source chain by end-to-end message delivery, Ink or Polygon?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Ink leads at 48.75 s versus Polygon at 111.95 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Ink or Polygon?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Polygon leads at 7.42 s versus Ink at 10.00 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Ink vs Polygon comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.