Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesInk
Trails7.50 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 26provisional
Unichain
No data in window
Ink vs Unichain
Unichain leads on the only live benchmark. Unichain wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (50.42 s vs 53.18 s).
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesInk
No data in window
Unichain
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesInk
Trails53.18 s
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 21provisional
Unichain
Leads50.42 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 59provisional
Frequently asked questions
Ink vs Unichain: which one is better?
Ink and Unichain are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Unichain leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Ink or Unichain?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Unichain leads at 50.42 s (provisional) versus Ink at 53.18 s (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Ink vs Unichain comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.