Kalshi leads on 2 of 7 shared benchmarks, Polymarket on 5. Kalshi wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($706.12M vs $59.16M), Prediction market open interest ($1.11B vs $336.23M). Polymarket wins on Prediction market API rate limits, tested with a daily ramp (96 ms vs 123 ms), Best prediction market API, ranked by live latency and uptime (93 ms vs 126 ms), Polymarket WebSocket latency, live connection and update speed from 3 regions (967 ms vs 5.0 min), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (88 vs 26). Data as of 2026-10-08 UTC.
Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h10 shared benchmarks, 7 measured on both sides
CFTC-regulated US prediction market exchange. REST trade API (trade-api/v2) with documented per-tier rate limits; the market data WebSocket requires authentication.
The largest crypto prediction market, settled on Polygon via UMA optimistic oracle. CLOB-style order book hosted on the Polymarket gateway with sub-second publish latency for live odds.
Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.
Ramp tiers stay well inside documented budgets where they exist, at most 7 percent of Polymarket's published book allowance, and every run aborts at the first sign of sustained errors. This benchmark measures throttle onset behaviour at polite request rates, not maximum venue throughput.
Uptime here means our probes succeeded from three specific regions at a polite request rate. A venue can be up for us and degraded for you, especially during regional network incidents, and a brief blip between probe cycles can go unrecorded. Treat the panel as a measured signal, not a guarantee.
Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.
Connect-to-snapshot includes Cloudflare edge latency and routing from each probe region. Numbers vary with network conditions and market activity. This bench measures observed end-to-end startup time, not venue-side processing time alone.
The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own
figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD),
so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without
changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions
held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x)
means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the
methodology say what each range usually means.
Every row is a month of funding at the venue's average daily cost over
the hours measured in the trailing 30 days (average x 30). A venue
ranks only with 576 of the 720 hours (24 days) behind that average;
under the floor the row is provisional, unranked, and shows its day
count (the venues added on 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23 start there).
Funding is signed: on a month where shorts paid longs the figure is
negative and "cheapest" means "was paid the most".
Open interest is not measured the same way everywhere. Venues with a
dedicated public API report it natively; the rest are read from
DefiLlama's protocol TVL, which is the closest public proxy and is not
the same thing. A CFTC-regulated exchange has no on-chain balance and
therefore no row when its API does not publish one. Size here says where
capital sits, not whether a venue is liquid or well run.
Frequently asked questions
Kalshi vs Polymarket: which one is better?
Kalshi and Polymarket are compared on 10 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Kalshi leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. Polymarket leads on Prediction market API rate limits, tested with a daily ramp. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is cheaper, Kalshi or Polymarket?
On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Kalshi leads at -2.35 bps versus Polymarket at 3.00 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster, Kalshi or Polymarket?
On the Prediction market API rate limits, tested with a daily ramp benchmark, Polymarket leads at 96 ms versus Kalshi at 123 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Kalshi vs Polymarket comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.