KyberSwap vs LI.FI

Name: KyberSwap vs LI.FI OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

KyberSwap leads on the only live benchmark. KyberSwap wins on Fastest EVM swap quote API (237 ms vs 710 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Mon, 24 Aug 2026 03:24:17 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

KyberSwap

EVM DEX aggregator by Kyber Network. Pathfinder routes across 420+ liquidity sources on 17+ EVM chains, splitting trades atomically for best net output after gas.

LI.FI

Cross-chain bridge and DEX aggregator. Routes swaps across bridges and liquidity sources via a single API, with EVM and Solana support.

Side by side measurements

Fastest EVM swap quote API

Aggregators

KyberSwap

Leads

237 ms

p99: 1.73 s
rank: #1
samples: 4,319

LI.FI

Trails

710 ms

p99: 2.25 s
rank: #3
samples: 2,679

Per chain · per region

Chain	Provider	US East	EU West	Singapore	Aggregate
Ethereum	KyberSwap	429 ms	422 ms	360 ms	404 ms
Ethereum	LI.FI	781 ms	784 ms	688 ms	751 ms
Base	KyberSwap	362 ms	358 ms	354 ms	358 ms
Base	LI.FI	798 ms	778 ms	743 ms	773 ms
Arbitrum	KyberSwap	95 ms	106 ms	79 ms	93 ms
Arbitrum	LI.FI	649 ms	617 ms	490 ms	585 ms
BSC	KyberSwap	103 ms	93 ms	78 ms	91 ms
BSC	LI.FI	756 ms	738 ms	697 ms	730 ms

Frequently asked questions

KyberSwap vs LI.FI: which one is better?

KyberSwap and LI.FI are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. KyberSwap leads on Fastest EVM swap quote API. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, KyberSwap or LI.FI?

On the Fastest EVM swap quote API benchmark, KyberSwap leads at 237 ms versus LI.FI at 710 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the KyberSwap vs LI.FI comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

LI.FI vs Mobula

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.