KyberSwap vs ParaSwap

Name: KyberSwap vs ParaSwap OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

KyberSwap leads on the only live benchmark. KyberSwap wins on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens (89.7% vs 10.8%).

Read methodology Last measured Wed, 09 Sep 2026 04:57:35 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

KyberSwap

EVM DEX aggregator by Kyber Network. Pathfinder routes across 420+ liquidity sources on 17+ EVM chains, splitting trades atomically for best net output after gas.

ParaSwap

DEX aggregator and DeFi middleware layer. The Augustus Router splits orders across AMMs, PMMs, and direct pools on 10+ EVM chains to minimize price impact and gas costs. Also offers a developer SDK for integrating best-execution routing into dApps and wallets.

Side by side measurements

Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens

Aggregators

KyberSwap

Leads

89.7 %

p99: 89.7%
rank: #2
samples: 958

ParaSwap

Trails

10.8 %

p99: 10.8%
rank: —
samples: 958

Per chain

Chain	KyberSwap	ParaSwap
BNB	61.6%	34.9%
Robinhood	99.9%	1.75%

Coverage means the aggregator returned a non-zero output amount for the probed token. It says nothing about quote quality, price accuracy or transaction success rate. A high score means the routing engine found at least one valid path. Latency is measured separately on evm-quote-latency and solana-dex-quote-latency. The token universe rotates hourly so the score reflects live indexer freshness, not a curated whitelist.

Frequently asked questions

KyberSwap vs ParaSwap: which one is better?

KyberSwap and ParaSwap are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. KyberSwap leads on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is more reliable, KyberSwap or ParaSwap?

On the Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens benchmark, KyberSwap leads at 89.7% versus ParaSwap at 10.8%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the KyberSwap vs ParaSwap comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.