Fastest EVM swap quote API
AggregatorsHeadline: All chains
KyberSwap
Trails224 ms
- p99
- 949 ms
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 4,314
SushiSwap
No data in window
Quote latency
KyberSwapn/aSushiSwapn/a
KyberSwap vs SushiSwap
KyberSwap leads on the only live benchmark. KyberSwap wins on Price to fees across DeFi (3.11x vs 5.71x). Data as of 2026-11-10 UTC.
KyberSwap
EVM DEX aggregator by Kyber Network. Pathfinder routes across 420+ liquidity sources on 17+ EVM chains, splitting trades atomically for best net output after gas.
SushiSwap
Sushi is a multichain DEX whose Sushi Perps v2 frontend routes orders into the Hyperliquid orderbook via a builder code, layering Sushi points incentives on top.
Side by side measurements
Price to fees across DeFi: what the market pays per dollar of protocol fees
Trading| Provider | P/F ratio | Fees MoM | Token 30d | Float | FDV / fees | Market cap | Fees 30d | Revenue 30d | P/S | TVL | Supply 30d | Supply 90d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KyberSwap | 3.11x | 78.9% | - | 86.8% | 3.58x | $21.29M | $563.0K | $563.0K | 3.11x | $1.12M | - | - |
| SushiSwap | 5.71x | 33.2% | - | 98.4% | 5.81x | $50.29M | $723.5K | $314.6K | 13.1x | $88.68M | - | - |
View
KyberSwapn/aSushiSwapn/a
A screen, not a verdict, and not advice. P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama, trailing 30d x 365/30) summed across every fee adapter that accrues to the token. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers. A low multiple can mean the market expects fees to fall, that the fees were incentivised, or that the token has no claim on them. Read it with the float, the category median and the monthly fee trend, then do your own work.
Best DEX aggregator by quote output: who actually gives you more
AggregatorsHeadline: All chains
KyberSwap
Trails0.65 bps
- p99
- 11.3 bps
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 4,314
SushiSwap
No data in window
Quote shortfall
KyberSwapn/aSushiSwapn/a
Every provider is asked for the same swap at the same second, and each answer is scored against the best of that round. The figure is how much less you would have received, in basis points. Quotes are not comparable between rounds: the market moves 30 to 37 bps in five minutes while the field sits inside 25. Two providers take a fee out of the quote and declare it, shown separately: giving up 25 bps to a toll is not routing badly.
Frequently asked questions
KyberSwap vs SushiSwap: which one is better?
KyberSwap and SushiSwap are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. KyberSwap leads on Price to fees across DeFi. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the lower p/f ratio, KyberSwap or SushiSwap?
On the Price to fees across DeFi benchmark, KyberSwap leads at 3.11x versus SushiSwap at 5.71x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the KyberSwap vs SushiSwap comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.