KyberSwap leads on all 3 live benchmarks. KyberSwap wins on Fastest EVM swap quote API (232 ms vs 442 ms), Price to fees across DeFi (3.05x vs 3.31x), Best DEX aggregator by quote output (1.04 bps vs 3.26 bps). Data as of 2026-11-14 UTC.
Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
EVM DEX aggregator by Kyber Network. Pathfinder routes across 420+ liquidity sources on 17+ EVM chains, splitting trades atomically for best net output after gas.
A screen, not a verdict, and not advice. P/F = circulating market cap
(CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama, trailing 30d x 365/30) summed
across every fee adapter that accrues to the token. Fees include the
share paid to liquidity providers. A low multiple can mean the market
expects fees to fall, that the fees were incentivised, or that the token
has no claim on them. Read it with the float, the category median and the
monthly fee trend, then do your own work.
Every provider is asked for the same swap at the same second, and each answer is scored against the best of that round. The figure is how much less you would have received, in basis points. Quotes are not comparable between rounds: the market moves 30 to 37 bps in five minutes while the field sits inside 25. Two providers take a fee out of the quote and declare it, shown separately: giving up 25 bps to a toll is not routing badly.
Frequently asked questions
KyberSwap vs Uniswap: which one is better?
KyberSwap and Uniswap are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. KyberSwap leads on Fastest EVM swap quote API. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, KyberSwap or Uniswap?
On the Fastest EVM swap quote API benchmark, KyberSwap leads at 232 ms versus Uniswap at 442 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the KyberSwap vs Uniswap comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.
