Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesLinea
No data in window
Unichain
No data in window
Split decision: Linea leads on Bridged TVL by chain ($376.26M vs $93.49M); Unichain leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (42.86 s vs 3.3 min). Data as of 2026-10-05 UTC.
ConsenSys zkEVM rollup with a prover-bound block cadence. Idle periods batch into longer intervals (p50 around 3-6 s) while busy periods produce blocks closer to the nominal 2 s mark.
Linea
No data in window
Unichain
No data in window
Linea
No data in window
Unichain
No data in window
Linea
Trails3.3 min
Unichain
Leads42.86 s
| Provider | Bridged TVL | Bridged share | 7d change | 7d vs peers | Native | Canonical | External |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linea | $376.26M | 99.6% | 0.40% | - | $1.65M | $130.54M | $245.72M |
| Unichain | $93.49M | 100.0% | 2.29% | 1.19% | - | $44.83M | $48.67M |
Bridged TVL is value secured by the chain's bridge, not value locked in its DeFi protocols; a chain can rank high on one and low on the other. The split is L2Beat's: canonical is escrowed on the host chain by the chain's own contracts, external came through a third-party bridge, native was minted here. Rows are the chains L2Beat tracks in its scaling summary; a settled L1 has no row by construction, not by omission. Size is not quality: a large balance says capital came, not that it stayed.
Linea and Unichain are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Linea leads on Bridged TVL by chain. Unichain leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Bridged TVL by chain benchmark, Linea leads at $376.26M versus Unichain at $93.49M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Unichain leads at 42.86 s (provisional) versus Linea at 3.3 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.