OpenChainBench

Mantle vs Monad

Monad leads on both live benchmarks. Monad wins on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (1.6 min vs 12.5 min), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (43.60 s vs 57.50 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
Mantle logo
Mantle

Modular OP Stack fork using EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum calldata, cutting L1 anchoring cost. 2-second sequencer block time, MNT token for gas (ETH-pegged).

Monad logo
Monad

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Mantle vs Monad: which one is better?

Mantle and Monad are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Monad leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Mantle or Monad?

On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Monad leads at 1.6 min (provisional) versus Mantle at 12.5 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Mantle vs Monad comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.