Mantle vs Robinhood Chain

Mantle leads on 1 of 4 shared benchmarks, Robinhood Chain on 3. Mantle wins on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.000668 vs $0.0121). Robinhood Chain wins on Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more (81 ms vs 1.82 s), Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (17.4 min vs 22.5 min), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (22.93 s vs 59.17 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Mantle logo
Mantle

Modular OP Stack fork using EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum calldata, cutting L1 anchoring cost. 2-second sequencer block time, MNT token for gas (ETH-pegged).

Robinhood Chain logo
Robinhood Chain

Robinhood is a US commission-free investing app with 25M+ funded accounts. It added crypto trading in 2018, launched its own L2 chain (Robinhood Chain) in 2025, and is the #1 most-reviewed financial app on the US App Store with nearly 5 million ratings.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Mantle vs Robinhood Chain: which one is better?

Mantle and Robinhood Chain are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Mantle leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains. Robinhood Chain leads on Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Mantle or Robinhood Chain?

On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains benchmark, Mantle leads at $0.000668 versus Robinhood Chain at $0.0121. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster, Mantle or Robinhood Chain?

On the Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more benchmark, Robinhood Chain leads at 81 ms versus Mantle at 1.82 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Mantle vs Robinhood Chain comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.