Meowrpc vs Tenderly

Side by side OpenChainBench measurements. Identical layout, no editorial verdict, the live data leads. Each panel surfaces the aggregate plus the chain and region breakdowns when the underlying bench exposes them, straight from the Prometheus queries that drive the parent benchmark pages.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
Meowrpc logo
Meowrpc

Free public RPC service covering Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism and other EVM chains. No registration required, modest rate limits per IP.

Tenderly logo
Tenderly

Tenderly's public gateway exposes a no-key JSON-RPC endpoint per chain at `gateway.tenderly.co/public/<slug>`. Covers Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Avalanche, Linea, Scroll and Mantle. The same Tenderly platform behind the keyed Web3 dev suite.

Side by side measurements

Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 7 more EVM chains

RPCs

Meowrpc

Trails

189 ms

p99
443 ms
rank
#14
samples
17,281

Tenderly

Leads

121 ms

p99
777 ms
rank
#8
samples
77,758

Per chain · per region

ChainProviderUS-EastEU-WestSingaporeAggregate
EthereumMeowrpc195 ms100 ms265 ms187 ms
Tenderly8 ms15 ms235 ms86 ms
ArbitrumMeowrpc198 ms111 ms266 ms192 ms
Tenderly9 ms17 ms237 ms88 ms

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.