Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesMonad
Trails3.50 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 43provisional
Optimism
No data in window
Monad vs Optimism
Monad leads on both live benchmarks. Monad wins on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (1.6 min vs 17.5 min), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (43.60 s vs 1.0 min).
Optimism
Optimistic rollup and the canonical OP Stack reference implementation. 2-second sequencer block time, 7-day fraud-proof window, anchored to Ethereum L1 via batch submissions to the Optimism Portal.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesMonad
Leads1.6 min
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 49provisional
Optimism
Trails17.5 min
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 3provisional
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesMonad
Leads43.60 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 65provisional
Optimism
Trails1.0 min
- p99
- 2.9 min
- rank
- #13
- samples
- 906
Frequently asked questions
Monad vs Optimism: which one is better?
Monad and Optimism are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Monad leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Monad or Optimism?
On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Monad leads at 1.6 min (provisional) versus Optimism at 17.5 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Monad vs Optimism comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.