OpenChainBench

Moonbeam vs Polygon

Moonbeam leads on 0 of 2 shared benchmarks, Polygon on 2. Polygon wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (7.42 s vs 40.31 s), Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (55.49 s vs 105.41 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
Moonbeam logo
Moonbeam
Polygon logo
Polygon

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Moonbeam vs Polygon: which one is better?

Moonbeam and Polygon are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Polygon leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Moonbeam or Polygon?

On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Polygon leads at 7.42 s versus Moonbeam at 40.31 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Moonbeam vs Polygon comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.