Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking
BridgesNEAR Intents
Trails2.00 s
- p99
- 4.95 s
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 5,073
Socket Protocol
Leads1.75 s
- p99
- 9.52 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 864
NEAR Intents vs Socket Protocol
NEAR Intents leads on 0 of 2 shared benchmarks, Socket Protocol on 2. Socket Protocol wins on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (1.75 s vs 2.00 s), Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional (0.33% vs 1.19%).
NEAR Intents
Cross-chain intent layer from NEAR Protocol. The 1Click API runs a solver auction bus, signed quotes are settled by the winning market maker. Quote latency reflects bid arrival, not route search across LPs.
Socket Protocol
Cross-chain interoperability protocol and bridge aggregator. The Socket API routes bridging and swap transactions across major EVM chains via underlying bridges including Across, Stargate, and CCTP.
Side by side measurements
Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional
BridgesNEAR Intents
Trails1.19 %
- p99
- 1.19%
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 103,290
Socket Protocol
Leads0.33 %
- p99
- 0.39%
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 17,280
Frequently asked questions
NEAR Intents vs Socket Protocol: which one is better?
NEAR Intents and Socket Protocol are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Socket Protocol leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest cross-chain bridge quote api, live ms ranking, NEAR Intents or Socket Protocol?
On the Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking benchmark, Socket Protocol leads at 1.75 s versus NEAR Intents at 2.00 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the NEAR Intents vs Socket Protocol comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.