Nodies vs Tenderly Gateway

Tenderly Gateway leads on all 6 live benchmarks. Tenderly Gateway wins on Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains (119 ms vs 139 ms), Ethereum RPC endpoints (118 ms vs 140 ms), Arbitrum RPC endpoints (102 ms vs 139 ms), Base RPC endpoints (113 ms vs 137 ms). Data as of 2026-10-02 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h7 shared benchmarks, 6 measured on both sides
Nodies logo
Nodies

Nodies is the surviving public-RPC frontend for POKT Network's decentralized infrastructure. Per-chain subdomains like `eth-pokt.nodies.app`, `polygon-pokt.nodies.app`, `arb-pokt.nodies.app`. Covers most major EVM chains no-key.

Tenderly Gateway logo
Tenderly Gateway

Tenderly's public gateway exposes a no-key JSON-RPC endpoint per chain at `gateway.tenderly.co/public/<slug>`. Covers Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Avalanche, Linea, Scroll and Mantle. The same Tenderly platform behind the keyed Web3 dev suite.

Side by side measurements

Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains (plus Solana and Polkadot)

RPCs

Nodies

Trails

139 ms

p99
252 ms
rank
#7
samples
25,912

Tenderly Gateway

Leads

119 ms

p99
149 ms
rank
#4
samples
129,469

Per chain · per region

ChainProviderUS-EastEU-WestSingaporeAggregate
EthereumNodies21 ms117 ms284 ms140 ms
Tenderly Gateway51 ms27 ms277 ms118 ms
ArbitrumNodies19 ms117 ms282 ms139 ms
Tenderly Gateway27 ms24 ms254 ms102 ms
OptimismNodies21 ms117 ms282 ms140 ms
Tenderly Gateway28 ms25 ms255 ms102 ms
BaseNodies19 ms111 ms279 ms136 ms
Tenderly Gateway45 ms26 ms267 ms113 ms
RPC latency
Nodiesn/aTenderly Gatewayn/a

Latency is conditional on success: the harness times only calls returning a valid fresh block, so a mostly-failing endpoint can post a fast p50. Rows below 50 percent success are degraded; unresponsive probes pin below the table. The All chains aggregate favours single-chain foundation endpoints (Base, Binance, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche officials) since they rank on one chain only; use a chain tab for honest comparison. Dead endpoints (cloudflare-eth POST returns -32603) are excluded.

Optimism RPC endpoints: free public URLs by latency

RPCs

Nodies

Trails

140 ms

p99
237 ms
rank
#4
samples
4,325

Tenderly Gateway

Leads

102 ms

p99
116 ms
rank
#3
samples
4,319

Per region

RegionNodiesTenderly Gateway
US-East21 ms28 ms
EU-West117 ms25 ms
Singapore282 ms255 ms
RPC latency
Nodiesn/aTenderly Gatewayn/a

Most reliable free public RPC, correctness incidents across 7 EVM chains

RPCs

Nodies

Trails

167

p99
0
rank
#7
samples
494

Tenderly Gateway

Leads

1

p99
0.034
rank
#4
samples
494

Per chain

ChainNodiesTenderly Gateway
Ethereum11
Reliability incidents
Nodiesn/aTenderly Gatewayn/a

A zero row means no incident was caught in the window, not a proof of correctness. Most providers post zero most days; this bench exists for the days they do not, and for the errors: a blocked eth_getLogs or a balance read gated behind a paid key at 40 blocks of depth counts as an incident because it is one from the caller's seat.

Rolling 24h · Reliability incidentsRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Nodies vs Tenderly Gateway: which one is better?

Nodies and Tenderly Gateway are compared on 7 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Tenderly Gateway leads on Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Nodies or Tenderly Gateway?

On the Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains benchmark, Tenderly Gateway leads at 119 ms versus Nodies at 139 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Nodies vs Tenderly Gateway comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.