Nordstern vs Route

Route leads on both live benchmarks. Route wins on Fastest EVM swap quote API (273 ms vs 376 ms), Best DEX aggregator by quote output (0.35 bps vs 0.65 bps). Data as of 2026-10-22 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Route logo
Route

Swap router for Robinhood Chain, chain ID 4663, and no other chain. route.fun is the swap interface; the partner API quotes and builds a swap in one request and is key-gated.

Side by side measurements

Fastest EVM swap quote API

Aggregators

Headline: All chains

Nordstern

Trails

376 ms

p99
1.96 s
rank
#4
samples
3,581

Route

Leads

273 ms

p99
1.03 s
rank
—
samples
716
Quote latency
Nordsternn/aRouten/a

Best DEX aggregator by quote output: who actually gives you more

Aggregators

Headline: All chains

Nordstern

Trails

0.65 bps

p99
8.12 bps
rank
#2
samples
3,581

Route

Leads

0.35 bps

p99
10.5 bps
rank
—
samples
715
Quote shortfall
Nordsternn/aRouten/a

Every provider is asked for the same swap at the same second, and each answer is scored against the best of that round. The figure is how much less you would have received, in basis points. Quotes are not comparable between rounds: the market moves 30 to 37 bps in five minutes while the field sits inside 25. Two providers take a fee out of the quote and declare it, shown separately: giving up 25 bps to a toll is not routing badly.

Frequently asked questions

Nordstern vs Route: which one is better?

Nordstern and Route are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Route leads on Fastest EVM swap quote API. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Nordstern or Route?

On the Fastest EVM swap quote API benchmark, Route leads at 273 ms versus Nordstern at 376 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Nordstern vs Route comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.