Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingPacifica
Leads$1.03B
- p99
- $1.11B
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 2,880
Paradex
Trails$20.31M
- p99
- $23.89M
- rank
- #22
- samples
- 2,880
Pacifica leads on all 3 live benchmarks. Pacifica wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($1.03B vs $20.31M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (78 vs 63), Perp DEX capital efficiency (3 vs 3).
Solana perp DEX optimized for high-frequency trading, oracle-anchored funding.
Paradex is a perps-focused L2 exchange built on Starknet tech, with USD-settled perpetuals and funding accrued continuously over an 8 hour period.
Pacifica
Leads$1.03B
Paradex
Trails$20.31M
Pacifica
Leads78
Paradex
Trails63
Pacifica
Leads3
Paradex
Trails3
TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.
| Provider | Fees 30d | Open interest | Fees / OI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pacifica | $3.57M | $57.80M | 0.751x |
| Paradex | $31.0K | $12.30M | 0.031x |
P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.
Pacifica and Paradex are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Pacifica leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Pacifica leads at $1.03B versus Paradex at $20.31M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.