Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingPacifica
Leads$875.51M
- p99
- $1.01B
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 2,880
SynFutures
Trails$79.03M
- p99
- $86.68M
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 2,880
24h perp volume
Pacifican/aSynFuturesn/a
Pacifica vs SynFutures
Pacifica leads on the only live benchmark. Pacifica wins on Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($875.51M vs $79.03M). Data as of 2026-10-10 UTC.
Pacifica
Solana perp DEX optimized for high-frequency trading, oracle-anchored funding.
SynFutures
SynFutures is an oAMM-based (Oyster AMM) perpetuals DEX on Base and Arbitrum. Traders open positions against a concentrated liquidity pool rather than a matching engine; any ERC-20 can be listed permissionlessly.
Side by side measurements
Perp DEX price to fees: what the market pays per dollar of trading fees
Trading| Provider | Fees 30d | Revenue 30d | Open interest | Fees / OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pacifica | $3.78M | $3.74M | $64.01M | 0.718x |
| SynFutures | $221.7K | $221.7K | $1.06M | 2.54x |
View
Pacifican/aSynFuturesn/a
P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Pacifica vs SynFutures: which one is better?
Pacifica and SynFutures are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Pacifica leads on Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Pacifica or SynFutures?
On the Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Pacifica leads at $875.51M versus SynFutures at $79.03M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Pacifica vs SynFutures comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.