Pacifica vs Vest

Pacifica leads on 1 of 4 shared benchmarks, Vest on 3. Pacifica wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($937.03M vs $205.23M). Vest wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (2.26 bps vs 3.00 bps), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (88 vs 78), Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live (69.5 bps vs 90.0 bps). Data as of 2026-09-23 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Pacifica logo
Pacifica

Solana perp DEX optimized for high-frequency trading, oracle-anchored funding.

Vest logo
Vest

Vest is a zk-settled perpetuals exchange listing crypto next to US equities, indices and FX perps under a {TICKER}-USD-PERP convention, with a public REST API (ticker, funding, order book) and no open-interest feed.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

Pacifica

Trails

3.00 bps

p99
3.00 bps
rank
#14
samples
1,547

Vest

Leads

2.26 bps

p99
-0.58 bps
rank
#6
samples
2,876
Funding cost to hold a long 24h
Pacifican/aVestn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live

Trading

Pacifica

Trails

90.0 bps

rank
samples
13provisional

Vest

Leads

69.5 bps

rank
samples
29provisional
Funding paid, 30d ETH long
Pacifican/aVestn/a

Every row is a month of funding at the venue's average daily cost over the hours measured in the trailing 30 days (average x 30). A venue ranks only with 576 of the 720 hours (24 days) behind that average; under the floor the row is provisional, unranked, and shows its day count (the venues added on 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23 start there). Funding is signed: on a month where shorts paid longs the figure is negative and "cheapest" means "was paid the most".

Rolling 24h · Funding paid, 30d ETH longRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Pacifica vs Vest: which one is better?

Pacifica and Vest are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Pacifica leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. Vest leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Pacifica or Vest?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Pacifica leads at $937.03M versus Vest at $205.23M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, Pacifica or Vest?

On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Vest leads at 2.26 bps versus Pacifica at 3.00 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Pacifica vs Vest comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.