Polkachu vs Stake&Relax

Stake&Relax leads on both live benchmarks. Stake&Relax wins on Neutron RPC endpoints (114 ms vs 176 ms), ZIGChain RPC endpoints (100 ms vs 131 ms). Data as of 2026-10-22 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Polkachu logo
Polkachu

Community-run Cosmos validator and public RPC network. Operates no-key Tendermint RPC endpoints across 40+ Cosmos SDK chains (osmosis-rpc.polkachu.com, cosmos-rpc.polkachu.com, etc.) with archive support on a paid tier.

Stake&Relax logo
Stake&Relax

Stake And Relax community validator providing public keyless Tendermint RPC for Cosmos SDK chains including Union.

Side by side measurements

Neutron RPC endpoints: free public URLs by latency

RPCs

Polkachu

Trails

176 ms

p99
689 ms
rank
#3
samples
4,332

Stake&Relax

Leads

114 ms

p99
410 ms
rank
#1
samples
4,329

Per region

RegionPolkachuStake&Relax
US-East267 ms106 ms
EU-West47 ms30 ms
Singapore214 ms207 ms
RPC latency
Polkachun/aStake&Relaxn/a

ZIGChain RPC endpoints: free public URLs by latency

RPCs

Polkachu

Trails

131 ms

p99
367 ms
rank
#3
samples
4,325

Stake&Relax

Leads

100 ms

p99
361 ms
rank
#2
samples
4,320

Per region

RegionPolkachuStake&Relax
US-East136 ms90 ms
EU-West45 ms21 ms
Singapore214 ms187 ms
RPC latency
Polkachun/aStake&Relaxn/a

Frequently asked questions

Polkachu vs Stake&Relax: which one is better?

Polkachu and Stake&Relax are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Stake&Relax leads on Neutron RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Polkachu or Stake&Relax?

On the Neutron RPC endpoints benchmark, Stake&Relax leads at 114 ms versus Polkachu at 176 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Polkachu vs Stake&Relax comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.