Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesPolygon
Trails4.44 s
- p99
- 14.26 s
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 353
Unichain
No data in window
Split decision: Polygon leads on Bridged TVL by chain ($3.90B vs $93.61M); Unichain leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (37.50 s vs 3.1 min). Data as of 2026-10-06 UTC.
Polygon
Trails4.44 s
Unichain
No data in window
Polygon
Trails12.5 min
Unichain
No data in window
Polygon
Trails3.1 min
Unichain
Leads37.50 s
| Provider | Bridged TVL | Bridged share | 7d change | 7d vs peers | Native | Canonical | External |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polygon | $3.90B | 95.2% | 0.40% | - | $197.89M | $2.45B | $1.44B |
| Unichain | $93.61M | 100.0% | 4.65% | 3.32% | - | $44.79M | $48.82M |
Bridged TVL is value secured by the chain's bridge, not value locked in its DeFi protocols; a chain can rank high on one and low on the other. The split is L2Beat's: canonical is escrowed on the host chain by the chain's own contracts, external came through a third-party bridge, native was minted here. Rows are the chains L2Beat tracks in its scaling summary; a settled L1 has no row by construction, not by omission. Size is not quality: a large balance says capital came, not that it stayed.
Polygon and Unichain are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Polygon leads on Bridged TVL by chain. Unichain leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Bridged TVL by chain benchmark, Polygon leads at $3.90B versus Unichain at $93.61M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Unichain leads at 37.50 s (provisional) versus Polygon at 3.1 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.