Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more
BlockchainsRobinhood Chain
Leads85 ms
- p99
- 200 ms
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 850,434
Scroll
Trails2.34 s
- p99
- 55.34 s
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 13,420
Robinhood Chain vs Scroll
Robinhood Chain leads on both live benchmarks. Robinhood Chain wins on Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more (85 ms vs 2.34 s), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (23.16 s vs 3.1 min).
Robinhood Chain
Robinhood is a US commission-free investing app with 25M+ funded accounts. It added crypto trading in 2018, launched its own L2 chain (Robinhood Chain) in 2025, and is the #1 most-reviewed financial app on the US App Store with nearly 5 million ratings.
Scroll
Native bytecode-equivalent zkEVM rollup. Sequencer cadence is prover-bound: empty periods see longer gaps between blocks while busy minutes produce blocks at a sub-3-second rate.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesRobinhood Chain
Trails17.4 min
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 71provisional
Scroll
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesRobinhood Chain
Leads23.16 s
- p99
- 21.8 min
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 820
Scroll
Trails3.1 min
- rank
- #14
- samples
- 33provisional
Frequently asked questions
Robinhood Chain vs Scroll: which one is better?
Robinhood Chain and Scroll are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Robinhood Chain leads on Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Robinhood Chain or Scroll?
On the Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more benchmark, Robinhood Chain leads at 85 ms versus Scroll at 2.34 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Robinhood Chain vs Scroll comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.