RPCsUpdated

Core Chain RPC endpoints: free public URLs by latency

HTTP round-trip latency for the `eth_getBlockByNumber("latest", false)` method against every free, no-key public Core Chain EVM endpoint, audited every 60 seconds from 3 regions.

TL;DR. As of , Ankr has the lowest median latency of the 3 free public Core Chain RPC endpoints measured, 77 ms (p50, 24h, 3 regions). Source: OpenChainBench, https://openchainbench.com/benchmarks/core-rpc. Chain ID 1116. 3 public endpoints, no key: rpc.ankr.com, rpc.coredao.org, core.drpc.org. Full URLs with their 24h median are listed below.

Companion page

Comparing free RPC endpoints across every chain we measure? Open the cross-chain RPC matrix →

Core Chain is a Bitcoin-aligned EVM-compatible L1 blockchain (chain 1116) using a hybrid Satoshi Plus consensus that combines Bitcoin PoW mining with delegated PoS, CORE as gas token, ~3 s block cadence, BTC staking via the Self-Custodial Bitcoin Staking protocol. The 2026-08-04 audit confirms 3 clean keyless providers: the Core DAO official endpoint (rpc.coredao.org), dRPC (core.drpc.org), Thirdweb (1116.rpc.thirdweb.com), and Ankr (rpc.ankr.com/core). Excluded: Alchemy (no Core route), QuickNode (key required).

Methodology

Core Chain: 3 free public RPC endpoints answering `eth_getBlockByNumber` every 60 seconds from us-east, eu-west and Singapore, ranked by 24h median. Ankr leads at 77 ms; the chain-official endpoint measures 146 ms. We measure the round-trip latency of a single, identical JSON-RPC call (`eth_getBlockByNumber("latest", false)`) against every no-key public Core Chain endpoint that sustains continuous probing, 3 providers measured, every 60 seconds, from us-east, eu-west and Singapore. The harness classifies every response (ok / http_err / jsonrpc_err / stale / timeout) with a Core Chain-scaled staleness gap (20 blocks at Core Chain's ~3 s block time). The cross-chain view lives on the parent `rpc-capabilities` benchmark; this page is the Core Chain-scoped answer with per-region breakdowns as a first-class dimension.

  • Cadence: every 60 seconds per provider, from each of 3 probe regions (us-east Virginia, eu-west Amsterdam, sgp Singapore). Headline p50/p90/p99 aggregate across all 3 regions via Prometheus `avg(quantile_over_time(...))`; per-region breakdowns are first-class on this page via the region tabs.
  • Payload: `{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":<rotating>,"method":"eth_getBlockByNumber","params":["latest", false]}`. Plain HTTP POST, identical for every endpoint, no API key in any request. The request id rotates, but that does not guarantee a cache miss: many caches normalise `id` away. Measured 2026-10-08, fixed and rotating ids answer within 2 to 4 percent of each other.
  • Latency measurement, call-result classification (`ok`, `http_err`, `jsonrpc_err`, `stale`, `timeout`) and the archive-depth audit follow the cluster method documented on [rpc-capabilities](openchainbench.com/benchmarks/rpc-capabilities#methodology); this page is the Core Chain-scoped view of the same harness, with the same exclusion rules.
  • Chain scope: every query on this page is pinned to `chain="core"`. Provider coverage: 3 no-key endpoints.

Results: 3 free public Core Chain RPC endpoints ranked by p50 latency (24h, 3 regions)

Core Chain RPC endpoints: free public URLs by latency: RPC latency per provider (p50, 24h).
№Providersp50p90p99Success
1Ankr77 ms100 ms240 ms85.41% (n=4313)
2Core DAO146 ms186 ms229 ms100.00% (n=4319)
3dRPC161 ms345 ms885 ms97.43% (n=4315)

Public Core Chain RPC endpoints measured

Chain ID 1116, currency CORE. The 3 no-key endpoints answering our probes today, with their current 24h median. Paste one into a wallet or a client as is: no signup, no key. Private providers (API key) are never listed with a URL.

  • Ankr logoAnkrhttps://rpc.ankr.com/core77 ms85.4%
  • Core DAO logoCore DAOhttps://rpc.coredao.org146 ms100.0%
  • dRPC logodRPChttps://core.drpc.org161 ms97.4%

Median round-trip and success rate over the last 24 hours across the probe regions; the ranked table above carries p90, p99 and the per-region split.

Declared, but not answering our probes

This endpoint is named in the spec and probed on the same schedule as the rest, and answers too rarely to carry a median. Below 5 % success we leave it out of the table rather than publish a latency drawn from a handful of replies. A provider can serve a browser and refuse a datacenter, so this says what a server deployment would meet, not what the endpoint is capable of.

  • Thirdwebhttps://1116.rpc.thirdweb.com1.1 % success over 24 h

Frequently asked

Which Core Chain RPCs work without an API key?

4 endpoints are probed on this chain: Core DAO official (https://rpc.coredao.org), dRPC (https://core.drpc.org), Thirdweb (https://1116.rpc.thirdweb.com), and Ankr (https://rpc.ankr.com/core). Every listed endpoint was live-verified with a `eth_getBlockByNumber` POST returning a parsable response before inclusion.

How is Core Chain RPC latency measured here, technically?

One identical `eth_getBlockByNumber("latest", false)` POST every 60 seconds against each provider from each of 3 regions, using the same plain HTTP client the rest of the RPC cluster uses. Wall-clock round-trip is recorded at millisecond precision; p50/p90/p99 are computed via Prometheus `quantile_over_time` over 24 hours. Responses are classified (`ok` / `http_err` / `jsonrpc_err` / `stale` / `timeout`) so an endpoint stuck on an old head or returning errors behind HTTP 200 is never ranked as fastest.

Source code github.com/ChainBench/OpenChainBench/tree/main/harnesses/rpc-capabilities