Fastest free Kava RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency
RPCsAnkr
Leads21 ms
- p99
- 992 ms
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 1,292
Thirdweb
No data in window
Per region
| Region | Ankr | Thirdweb |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 10 ms | 607 ms |
| EU-West | 9 ms | 774 ms |
| Singapore | 44 ms | 618 ms |
Ankr vs Thirdweb
Ankr leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks, Thirdweb on 0. Ankr wins on Fastest free Kava RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency (21 ms vs 666 ms), Fastest free Swellchain RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency (6 ms vs 605 ms).
Ankr
Multi-chain RPC service covering 65+ chains on the freemium tier. One API key across chains; some networks are premium-gated.
Thirdweb
ThirdWeb operates a keyless public RPC gateway at `<chainid>.rpc.thirdweb.com` covering 2000+ EVM chains via chain-id routing. Free tier is rate-limited per IP with no signup; paid tiers unlock higher throughput and dedicated endpoints. Used keyless across 13 chains on the RPC latency cluster (arbitrum, ethereum, polygon, optimism, base, bnb, avalanche, linea, worldchain, kaia, ink, opbnb + more).
Side by side measurements
Fastest free Swellchain RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency
RPCsAnkr
Leads6 ms
- p99
- 336 ms
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 1,360
Thirdweb
No data in window
Per region
| Region | Ankr | Thirdweb |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 6 ms | 605 ms |
| EU-West | 6 ms | 609 ms |
| Singapore | 8 ms | 601 ms |
Frequently asked questions
Ankr vs Thirdweb: which one is better?
Ankr and Thirdweb are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ankr leads on Fastest free Kava RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest free kava rpc, live no-key evm endpoint latency, Ankr or Thirdweb?
On the Fastest free Kava RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency benchmark, Ankr leads at 21 ms versus Thirdweb at 666 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Ankr vs Thirdweb comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.