Across vs Relay on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks, awaiting live measurements.
Optimistic cross-chain bridge by Risk Labs. Intents are filled by relayers who front liquidity on the destination, repaid from a canonical hub pool. Settlement is typically sub-30 seconds on liquid corridors.
Cross-chain intent network from Reservoir. Users sign an intent, relayers compete to fill on the destination, settlement is typically sub-30 seconds.
Across
No data in window
Relay
No data in window
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | US-East | Singapore | EU-West | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | Across | 245 ms | 209 ms | - | 245 ms |
| Relay | 949 ms | 989 ms | - | 938 ms | |
| Base to Arb | Across | 2.57 s | 2.52 s | 934 ms | 934 ms |
| Relay | 423 ms | 575 ms | 395 ms | 395 ms |
Across
No data in window
Relay
No data in window
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | US-East | Singapore | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | Across | 0.010% | 0.010% | 0.010% | 0.010% |
| Relay | 0.030% | 0.029% | 0.029% | 0.030% | |
| Base to Arb | Across | 0.29% | 0.29% | 0.29% | 0.29% |
| Relay | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
Across and Relay are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.