OpenChainBench

Aevo vs ASTER

ASTER leads on both live benchmarks. ASTER wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($1.97B vs $5.56M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues (579 vs 238).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Aevo logo
Aevo

OP Stack perp DEX with deep options support, event-driven flow.

ASTER logo
ASTER

Aster is a decentralized perps exchange (ex-ApolloX, backed by YZi Labs) on BNB Chain and other EVM networks, with a Binance-compatible API and 8 hour funding periods.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Aevo vs ASTER: which one is better?

Aevo and ASTER are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. ASTER leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Aevo or ASTER?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, ASTER leads at $1.97B versus Aevo at $5.56M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Aevo vs ASTER comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.