Aevo vs Aster

Aevo leads on 2 of 5 shared benchmarks, Aster on 3. Aevo wins on Perp DEX capital efficiency (16 vs 0.769), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.098x vs 0.536x). Aster wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($592.11M vs $2.40M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (596 vs 238), Perp DEX daily volume 2026 ($568.86M vs $1.91M). Data as of 2026-10-11 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
Aevo logo
Aevo

OP Stack perp DEX with deep options support, event-driven flow.

Aster logo
Aster

Aster is a decentralized perps exchange (ex-ApolloX, backed by YZi Labs) on BNB Chain and other EVM networks, with a Binance-compatible API and 8 hour funding periods.

Daily perp volume, head to head

Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.

Bench 266, all venues

7d lead

Aster

$21.3M vs $10.84B

30d lead

Aster

$118M vs $56.03B

Days led, last 30

0 / 30

Aevo / Aster

Current streak

90 days

Aster since Jul 13, 2026

AevoAster

UTC days, one side per trade

02.5B5B7.5B10BJul 13Oct 10lead

Aevo volume ÷ Aster volume, week by week

The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.

0.2% · week to 10 Oct · median 0.1%

Aevo ÷ Aster, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day

0%50%100%median 0%27 Jun11 Jul25 Jul8 Aug22 Aug5 Sep19 Sep3 Oct10 Oct

4 Oct to 10 Oct

Aevo ÷ Aster0.2%
vs median+0.1pt
= Aevo volume$21.3M
÷ Aster volume$10.84B
WindowAevoAsterAevo / Aster
Last closed day (Oct 10, 2026)$1.9M$569M0%
Last 7 days$21.3M$10.84B0%
Last 30 days$118M$56.03B0%

Sources: Aevo, Aevo /statistics PERPETUAL daily_volume per UTC day. Aster, Aster fapi 1d klines quoteVolume summed over TRADING perpetual symbols. Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Oct 10, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

Aevo

Leads

16

p99
16
rank
#3
samples
2,880

Aster

Trails

0.769

p99
0.769
rank
#9
samples
2,880
Markets per $M TVL
Aevon/aAstern/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Perp DEX daily volume 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, Gains, dYdX by UTC day, backfilled

Trading
ProviderDaily perp volumeVolume 30dShare 30d
Aevo$1.91M$118.21M0.032%
Aster$568.86M$56.03B15.1%
View
Aevon/aAstern/a

Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.

Rolling 24h · Daily perp volumeRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Aevo

Leads

0.098x

p99
0.122x
rank
#2
samples
2,880

Aster

Trails

0.536x

p99
0.827x
rank
#7
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Aevon/aAstern/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Aevo vs Aster: which one is better?

Aevo and Aster are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aevo leads on Perp DEX capital efficiency. Aster leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher markets per $m tvl, Aevo or Aster?

On the Perp DEX capital efficiency benchmark, Aevo leads at 16 versus Aster at 0.769. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Aevo or Aster?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Aster leads at $592.11M versus Aevo at $2.40M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Aevo vs Aster comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.