Aptos vs Kaia

Kaia leads on all 3 live benchmarks. Kaia wins on Highest staking yield, live net APR by proof-of-stake chain (3.92% vs 2.39%), Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across L1 and L2 chains ($0.0000172 vs $0.0000329), Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost per L1 chain ($0.000459 vs $0.0784). Data as of 2026-11-14 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
Aptos logo
Aptos

Move-based L1 running a pipelined BFT consensus with sub-second blocks; a committed transaction is final.

Kaia logo
Kaia

EVM-compatible L1 formed from the merger of Klaytn and Finschia, using Istanbul BFT consensus with immediate finality and one-second blocks.

Side by side measurements

Highest staking yield, live net APR by proof-of-stake chain

Blockchains

Aptos

Trails

2.39 %

rank
#12
samples
50provisional

Kaia

Leads

3.92 %

rank
#8
samples
9provisional
Net yield
Aptosn/aKaian/a

Nominal yield in the staked token, not real yield: a 19% APR on a token that inflates 12% a year is worth less than it looks, and price moves dominate both. MEV is included on Solana only and excluded on Ethereum. ICP is one neuron profile (2 year dissolve delay), Algorand one opt-in solo node, Ethereum one network average. Stellar and Somnia are not ranked, see the methodology.

Frequently asked questions

Aptos vs Kaia: which one is better?

Aptos and Kaia are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Kaia leads on Highest staking yield, live net APR by proof-of-stake chain. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher net yield, Aptos or Kaia?

On the Highest staking yield, live net APR by proof-of-stake chain benchmark, Kaia leads at 3.92% (provisional) versus Aptos at 2.39% (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Aptos vs Kaia comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.