Aster vs GRVT

Aster leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks, GRVT on 1. Aster wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($592.11M vs $474.35M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (596 vs 194), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.536x vs 1.044x). GRVT wins on Perp DEX capital efficiency (6 vs 0.769). Data as of 2026-10-11 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Aster logo
Aster

Aster is a decentralized perps exchange (ex-ApolloX, backed by YZi Labs) on BNB Chain and other EVM networks, with a Binance-compatible API and 8 hour funding periods.

GRVT logo
GRVT

zkSync hybrid CEX/DEX perp venue with privacy-preserving order matching.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

Aster

Trails

0.769

p99
0.769
rank
#9
samples
2,880

GRVT

Leads

6

p99
6
rank
#4
samples
2,880
Markets per $M TVL
Astern/aGRVTn/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Aster

Leads

0.536x

p99
0.827x
rank
#7
samples
2,880

GRVT

Trails

1.044x

p99
1.152x
rank
#14
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Astern/aGRVTn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Aster vs GRVT: which one is better?

Aster and GRVT are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aster leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. GRVT leads on Perp DEX capital efficiency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Aster or GRVT?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Aster leads at $592.11M versus GRVT at $474.35M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the higher markets per $m tvl, Aster or GRVT?

On the Perp DEX capital efficiency benchmark, GRVT leads at 6 versus Aster at 0.769. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Aster vs GRVT comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.