Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingAster
Leads$2.55B
- p99
- $2.85B
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 2,880
Pacifica
Trails$989.67M
- p99
- $1.11B
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 2,880
24h perp volume
Astern/aPacifican/a
Aster vs Pacifica
Aster leads on both live benchmarks. Aster wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($2.55B vs $989.67M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (586 vs 77).
Aster
Aster is a decentralized perps exchange (ex-ApolloX, backed by YZi Labs) on BNB Chain and other EVM networks, with a Binance-compatible API and 8 hour funding periods.
Pacifica
Solana perp DEX optimized for high-frequency trading, oracle-anchored funding.
Side by side measurements
Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue
TradingAster
Leads586
- p99
- 586
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 2,880
Pacifica
Trails77
- p99
- 78
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 2,880
Active markets
Astern/aPacifican/a
Perp DEX price to fees ratio 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, GNS live
Trading| Provider | Fees 30d | Open interest | Fees / OI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aster | $6.49M | $1.43B | 0.055x |
| Pacifica | $3.57M | $58.02M | 0.749x |
View
Astern/aPacifican/a
P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Aster vs Pacifica: which one is better?
Aster and Pacifica are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aster leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Aster or Pacifica?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Aster leads at $2.55B versus Pacifica at $989.67M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Aster vs Pacifica comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.