Aster vs Paradex

Split decision: Aster leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($1.60B vs $9.59M) and Perp DEX execution quality (0.0019% vs 0.42%); Paradex leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.032% vs 0.051%) and Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (2.41 bps vs 2.53 bps). Data as of 2026-11-06 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h11 shared benchmarks, 10 measured on both sides
Aster logo
Aster

Aster is a decentralized perps exchange (ex-ApolloX, backed by YZi Labs) on BNB Chain and other EVM networks, with a Binance-compatible API and 8 hour funding periods.

Paradex logo
Paradex

Paradex is a perps-focused L2 exchange built on Starknet tech, with USD-settled perpetuals and funding accrued continuously over an 8 hour period.

Daily perp volume, head to head

Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.

Bench 266, all venues

7d lead

Aster

$11.69B vs $56.8M

30d lead

Aster

$48.85B vs $290M

Days led, last 30

30 / 0

Aster / Paradex

Current streak

90 days

Aster since Aug 8, 2026

AsterParadex

UTC days, one side per trade

02.5B5B7.5B10BAug 8Nov 5lead

Aster volume ÷ Paradex volume, week by week

The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.

20581.9% · week to 5 Nov · median 19416.4%

Aster ÷ Paradex, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day

0%12500%25000%37500%50000%median 19416%23 Jul6 Aug20 Aug3 Sep17 Sep1 Oct15 Oct29 Oct5 Nov

30 Oct to 5 Nov

Aster ÷ Paradex20581.9%
vs median+1165.6pt
= Aster volume$11.69B
÷ Paradex volume$56.8M
WindowAsterParadexAster / Paradex
Last closed day (Nov 5, 2026)$2.58B$12.9M19995%
Last 7 days$11.69B$56.8M20582%
Last 30 days$48.85B$290M16836%

Sources: Aster, Aster fapi 1d klines quoteVolume summed over TRADING perpetual symbols. Paradex, Paradex public Metabase daily card, PERP_VOLUME column (perps only, options and spot excluded). Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Nov 5, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading
ProviderFunding cost to hold a long 24hAnnualized (ETH)Per-hour rate (ETH)BTC hold 24hSOL hold 24h
Aster2.53 bps10.9%0.13 bps3.00 bps2.63 bps
Paradex2.41 bps6.86%0.08 bps2.94 bps1.97 bps
View
Astern/aParadexn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked

Trading

Aster

Trails

0.0076 %

p99
0.012%
rank
#5
samples
2,880

Paradex

Leads

0.0053 %

p99
0.015%
rank
#2
samples
2,880
24h ETH funding stddev
Astern/aParadexn/a

Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.

Rolling 24h · 24h ETH funding stddevRaw JSON

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

Aster

Leads

124

p99
124
rank
#3
samples
2,880

Paradex

Trails

23

p99
23
rank
#13
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
Astern/aParadexn/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

Aster

Trails

0.808

p99
0.808
rank
#8
samples
2,880

Paradex

Leads

3

p99
3
rank
#5
samples
2,880
Markets per $M TVL
Astern/aParadexn/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Perp DEX price to fees: what the market pays per dollar of trading fees

Trading
ProviderFDV / feesFees 30dFloatOpen interestFees / OI
Aster106.0x$4.19M33.0%$1.36B0.038x
Paradex186.7x$15.1K18.1%$12.66M0.014x
View
Astern/aParadexn/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX daily volume 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, Gains, dYdX by UTC day, backfilled

Trading
ProviderDaily perp volumeVolume 30dShare 30d
Aster$2.58B$48.85B12.2%
Paradex$12.93M$290.15M0.073%
View
Astern/aParadexn/a

Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.

Last closed day · Daily perp volumeRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Aster

Trails

1.398x

p99
1.575x
rank
#9
samples
2,880

Paradex

Leads

0.412x

p99
0.569x
rank
#4
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Astern/aParadexn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Aster vs Paradex: which one is better?

Aster and Paradex are compared on 11 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aster leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. Paradex leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Aster or Paradex?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Aster leads at $1.60B versus Paradex at $9.59M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, Aster or Paradex?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Paradex leads at 0.032% versus Aster at 0.051%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Aster vs Paradex comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.