Aster vs Paradex

Aster leads on 6 of 7 shared benchmarks, Paradex on 1. Aster wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.051% vs 0.31%), Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (2.98 bps vs 2.99 bps), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($1.78B vs $16.87M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (585 vs 63). Paradex wins on Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.00008% vs 0.00081%).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h7 shared benchmarks
Aster logo
Aster

Aster is a decentralized perps exchange (ex-ApolloX, backed by YZi Labs) on BNB Chain and other EVM networks, with a Binance-compatible API and 8 hour funding periods.

Paradex logo
Paradex

Paradex is a perps-focused L2 exchange built on Starknet tech, with USD-settled perpetuals and funding accrued continuously over an 8 hour period.

Daily perp volume, head to head

Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.

Bench 266, all venues

7d lead

Aster

$17.14B vs $73.8M

30d lead

Aster

$66.98B vs $282M

Days led, last 30

30 / 0

Aster / Paradex

Current streak

90 days

Aster since Jun 23, 2026

AsterParadex

UTC days, one side per trade

02.5B5B7.5B10BJun 23Sep 20lead

Aster volume ÷ Paradex volume, week by week

The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.

23229.2% · week to 20 Sep · median 20454.9%

Aster ÷ Paradex, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day

0%11000%22000%33000%44000%median 20455%7 Jun21 Jun5 Jul19 Jul2 Aug16 Aug30 Aug13 Sep20 Sep

14 Sep to 20 Sep

Aster ÷ Paradex23229.2%
vs median+2774.4pt
= Aster volume$17.14B
÷ Paradex volume$73.8M
WindowAsterParadexAster / Paradex
Last closed day (Sep 20, 2026)$1.69B$14.6M11528%
Last 7 days$17.14B$73.8M23229%
Last 30 days$66.98B$282M23718%

Sources: Aster, Aster fapi 1d klines quoteVolume summed over TRADING perpetual symbols. Paradex, Paradex public Metabase daily card, PERP_VOLUME column (perps only, options and spot excluded). Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Sep 20, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading
ProviderFunding cost to hold a long 24hAnnualized (ETH)Per-hour rate (ETH)BTC hold 24hSOL hold 24h
Aster2.98 bps8.52%0.10 bps0.52 bps3.00 bps
Paradex2.99 bps10.9%0.12 bps2.98 bps2.92 bps
View
Astern/aParadexn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (1h for Hyperliquid and dYdX, 4h or 8h elsewhere); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked

Trading

Aster

Trails

0.00081 %

p99
0.0011%
rank
#2
samples
2,880

Paradex

Leads

0.00008 %

p99
0.0023%
rank
#1
samples
2,880
24h ETH funding stddev
Astern/aParadexn/a

Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.

Rolling 24h · 24h ETH funding stddevRaw JSON

Perp DEX price to fees ratio 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, GNS live

Trading
ProviderP/F ratioFDV / feesFees 30dFloatOpen interestFees / OI
Aster26.4x76.0x$6.22M34.8%$1.44B0.053x
Paradex110.0x164.6x$26.4K66.8%$10.70M0.030x
View
Astern/aParadexn/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX daily volume 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, Gains, dYdX by UTC day, backfilled

Trading
ProviderDaily perp volumeVolume 30dShare 30d
Aster$1.69B$66.98B18.3%
Paradex$14.64M$282.39M0.077%
View
Astern/aParadexn/a

Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.

Rolling 24h · Daily perp volumeRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Aster vs Paradex: which one is better?

Aster and Paradex are compared on 7 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aster leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. Paradex leads on Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper on all-in cost, Aster or Paradex?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Aster leads at 0.051% versus Paradex at 0.31%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper on 24h eth funding stddev, Aster or Paradex?

On the Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked benchmark, Paradex leads at 0.00008% versus Aster at 0.00081%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Aster vs Paradex comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.