Aster vs Vest

Aster leads on 3 of 5 shared benchmarks, Vest on 2. Aster wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($2.28B vs $233.77M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (586 vs 88), Perp DEX asset breadth (124 vs 75). Vest wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (2.35 bps vs 2.45 bps), Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.0042% vs 0.0065%).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
Aster logo
Aster

Aster is a decentralized perps exchange (ex-ApolloX, backed by YZi Labs) on BNB Chain and other EVM networks, with a Binance-compatible API and 8 hour funding periods.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

Aster

Trails

2.45 bps

p99
1.89 bps
rank
#7
samples
2,880

Vest

Leads

2.35 bps

p99
-0.36 bps
rank
#5
samples
300
Funding cost to hold a long 24h
Astern/aVestn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (1h for Hyperliquid and dYdX, 4h or 8h elsewhere); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked

Trading

Aster

Trails

0.0065 %

p99
0.0094%
rank
#8
samples
2,880

Vest

Leads

0.0042 %

p99
0.0017%
rank
#3
samples
300
24h ETH funding stddev
Astern/aVestn/a

Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.

Rolling 24h · 24h ETH funding stddevRaw JSON

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, forex + stocks + indices + commodities

Trading

Aster

Leads

124

p99
124
rank
#3
samples
400

Vest

Trails

75

p99
75
rank
#6
samples
300
Non-crypto markets
Astern/aVestn/a

Market count reflects the Mobula perp pairs catalog at query time. Only mainnet markets are counted (testnets excluded). Asset class tags (forex, stocks, indices, commodities) are assigned by Mobula's editorial taxonomy and updated when new pairs are listed. Venues not in the Mobula catalog (Hyperliquid, GMX, dYdX, Ostium, Vertex, Paradex, Aster) are monitored separately: their catalogs are crypto-only or verified crypto-only by native API.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Aster vs Vest: which one is better?

Aster and Vest are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aster leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. Vest leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Aster or Vest?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Aster leads at $2.28B versus Vest at $233.77M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, Aster or Vest?

On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Vest leads at 2.35 bps versus Aster at 2.45 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Aster vs Vest comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.