Aster vs Vest

Aster leads on all 6 live benchmarks. Aster wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (0.71 bps vs 1.58 bps), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($752.37M vs $115.54M), Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.0019% vs 0.0054%), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (596 vs 88). Data as of 2026-10-10 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h6 shared benchmarks
Aster logo
Aster

Aster is a decentralized perps exchange (ex-ApolloX, backed by YZi Labs) on BNB Chain and other EVM networks, with a Binance-compatible API and 8 hour funding periods.

Vest logo
Vest

Vest is a zk-settled perpetuals exchange listing crypto next to US equities, indices and FX perps under a {TICKER}-USD-PERP convention, with a public REST API (ticker, funding, order book) and no open-interest feed.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

Aster

Leads

0.71 bps

p99
1.91 bps
rank
#5
samples
2,880

Vest

Trails

1.58 bps

p99
-2.36 bps
rank
#11
samples
2,880
Funding cost to hold a long 24h
Astern/aVestn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked

Trading

Aster

Leads

0.0019 %

p99
0.0045%
rank
#2
samples
2,880

Vest

Trails

0.0054 %

p99
0.0040%
rank
#7
samples
2,880
24h ETH funding stddev
Astern/aVestn/a

Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.

Rolling 24h · 24h ETH funding stddevRaw JSON

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

Aster

Leads

124

p99
124
rank
#3
samples
2,880

Vest

Trails

75

p99
75
rank
#6
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
Astern/aVestn/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live

Trading

Aster

Leads

51.9 bps

p99
19.8 bps
rank
—
samples
416

Vest

Trails

64.2 bps

p99
-18.4 bps
rank
—
samples
432
Funding paid, 30d ETH long
Astern/aVestn/a

Every row is a month of funding at the venue's average daily cost over the hours measured in the trailing 30 days (average x 30). A venue ranks only with 576 of the 720 hours (24 days) behind that average; under the floor the row is provisional, unranked, and shows its day count (the venues added on 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23 start there). Funding is signed: on a month where shorts paid longs the figure is negative and "cheapest" means "was paid the most".

Rolling 24h · Funding paid, 30d ETH longRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Aster vs Vest: which one is better?

Aster and Vest are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aster leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Aster or Vest?

On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Aster leads at 0.71 bps versus Vest at 1.58 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Aster vs Vest comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.