Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost per L1 chain
BlockchainsAvalanche
Trails$0.0316
- p99
- $0.0836
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 20,160
Osmosis
Leads$0.00101
- p99
- $0.00110
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 19,740
Token deployment cost USD
Avalanchen/aOsmosisn/a
Avalanche vs Osmosis
Osmosis leads on both live benchmarks. Osmosis wins on Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost per L1 chain ($0.00101 vs $0.0316), Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (44.29 s vs 49.29 s). Data as of 2026-11-15 UTC.
Avalanche
Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.
Osmosis
Cosmos SDK appchain and the largest IBC-connected DEX. CometBFT consensus with deterministic finality per block, around 6-second block time. TokenFactory module exposes MsgCreateDenom with denom_creation_fee currently set to an empty list, so creating a new denom costs only gas.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesAvalanche
Trails49.29 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 29provisional
Osmosis
Leads44.29 s
- p99
- 2.0 min
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 147
Axelar GMP delivery
Avalanchen/aOsmosisn/a
Frequently asked questions
Avalanche vs Osmosis: which one is better?
Avalanche and Osmosis are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Osmosis leads on Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost per L1 chain. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is cheaper, Avalanche or Osmosis?
On the Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost per L1 chain benchmark, Osmosis leads at $0.00101 versus Avalanche at $0.0316. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Avalanche vs Osmosis comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.