OpenChainBench

Avalanche vs Solana

Avalanche leads on 5 of 6 shared benchmarks, Solana on 1. Avalanche wins on Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live across 11 chains (1.3 s vs 9.9 s), Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation (0.039% vs 0.039%), Highest staking yield, live validator net APR across 7 PoS chains (6.80% vs 4.97%), Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (6.36 s vs 12.59 s). Solana wins on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (1.1 min vs 1.4 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h6 shared benchmarks
Avalanche logo
Avalanche

Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.

Solana logo
Solana

Proof-of-History sequencing combined with Tower BFT consensus. Probabilistic finality at 32 confirmed slots. Slot time around 400 milliseconds.

Side by side measurements

Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation

Trading

Avalanche

Leads

0.039 %

p99
0.12%
rank
#5
samples
11,520

Solana

Trails

0.039 %

p99
0.079%
rank
#6
samples
11,520

Three caveats. (1) Lower is better, but a non-zero floor (~5-20 bps) is normal, ticker last-traded prices have micro-jitter and Chainlink updates only on deviation/heartbeat. (2) XRP, ADA, DOGE measured on 3 sources because Chainlink deprecated those USD feeds on Ethereum mainnet, tag flags it. (3) POL/USD is the post-migration symbol for MATIC; we point at POLUSDT (not the frozen legacy MATICUSDT).

Rolling 24h · Max cross-oracle deviationRaw JSON

Highest staking yield, live validator net APR across 7 PoS chains

Blockchains

Avalanche

Leads

6.80 %

p99
8.33%
rank
#2
samples
100

Solana

Trails

4.97 %

p99
5.41%
rank
#3
samples
200

Honest scope. (1) `net_yield = gross_apr × uptime`. NOT "yield net of MEV", Stakewiz `total_apy` already folds Jito MEV into gross, MEV is INCLUDED. `mev_share_bps` exists for transparency, not subtraction. (2) Solana median is dragged by ~42 vals at 0% APY (commission 100% or zero leader slots). (3) Hyperliquid: centralised sequencer, no separate MEV layer, ~30 vals only. (4) Ethereum: one network-average consensus-layer APR from the beacon spec formula, execution tips and MEV excluded.

Frequently asked questions

Avalanche vs Solana: which one is better?

Avalanche and Solana are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Avalanche leads on Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live across 11 chains. Solana leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Avalanche or Solana?

On the Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live across 11 chains benchmark, Avalanche leads at 1.3 s versus Solana at 9.9 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster, Avalanche or Solana?

On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Solana leads at 1.1 min versus Avalanche at 1.4 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Avalanche vs Solana comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.