Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live wall-clock measurement per chain
BlockchainsAvalanche
Trails6.0 s
- p99
- 8.4 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 76,597
Sui
No data in window
Finality time
Avalanchen/aSuin/a
Avalanche vs Sui
Avalanche leads on 1 of 3 shared benchmarks, Sui on 2. Avalanche wins on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across L1 and L2 chains ($0.00149 vs $0.00843). Sui wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (3.00 s vs 3.67 s), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (15.00 s vs 27.21 s). Data as of 2026-10-10 UTC.
Avalanche
Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.
Sui
Move-based L1 using Mysticeti BFT consensus over a DAG. Owned-object transactions bypass consensus via Fast Path. Deterministic finality under one second.
Side by side measurements
Highest staking yield, live validator net APR across 7 PoS chains
BlockchainsAvalanche
Leads6.80 %
- p99
- 8.33%
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 100
Sui
No data in window
Net yield
Avalanchen/aSuin/a
Honest scope. (1) `net_yield = gross_apr × uptime`. NOT "yield net of MEV", Stakewiz `total_apy` already folds Jito MEV into gross, MEV is INCLUDED. `mev_share_bps` exists for transparency, not subtraction. (2) Solana median is dragged by ~42 vals at 0% APY (commission 100% or zero leader slots). (3) Hyperliquid: centralised sequencer, no separate MEV layer, ~30 vals only. (4) Ethereum: one network-average consensus-layer APR from the beacon spec formula, execution tips and MEV excluded.
Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across L1 and L2 chains
BlockchainsAvalanche
Leads$0.00149
- p99
- $0.0181
- rank
- #13
- samples
- 20,160
Sui
Trails$0.00843
- p99
- $0.00863
- rank
- #17
- samples
- 20,160
Native transfer fee USD
Avalanchen/aSuin/a
Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesAvalanche
Trails3.67 s
- p99
- 13.03 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 118
Sui
Leads3.00 s
- p99
- 9.89 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 263
VAA finalization
Avalanchen/aSuin/a
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesAvalanche
Trails27.21 s
- p99
- 1.9 min
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 184
Sui
Leads15.00 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 2provisional
LayerZero delivery
Avalanchen/aSuin/a
Stablecoin flow by chain: where dollars actually moved over 30 days
Blockchains| Provider | 30d change | Stablecoin float | Net 7d | 7d change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avalanche | - | $1.47B | - | - |
| Sui | 6.45% | $500.81M | $9.20M | 1.87% |
View
Avalanchen/aSuin/a
Stablecoin float is where dollars are parked, not what they do. A chain can take in a billion that sits idle, and lose float to a single issuer redeeming. The figure is DefiLlama's chain-wide pegged-USD aggregate, every issuer combined; it does not separate a bridge inflow from a native mint, and a dollar bridged to an L2 counts on both chains, so rows are not additive. Read the net dollars with the percentage beside them: the same $400M is a rounding error on Ethereum and a doubling elsewhere.
Frequently asked questions
Avalanche vs Sui: which one is better?
Avalanche and Sui are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Avalanche leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across L1 and L2 chains. Sui leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is cheaper, Avalanche or Sui?
On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across L1 and L2 chains benchmark, Avalanche leads at $0.00149 versus Sui at $0.00843. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster, Avalanche or Sui?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Sui leads at 3.00 s versus Avalanche at 3.67 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Avalanche vs Sui comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.