Axiom vs Binance Wallet

Binance Wallet leads on both live benchmarks. Binance Wallet wins on Trading terminal fill quality 2026 (278 bps vs 371 bps), Trading terminal execution quality 2026 (220 bps vs 287 bps). Data as of 2026-11-09 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Axiom logo
Axiom

Axiom is a Solana-native trading terminal expanding to Hyperliquid perps with a registered builder code, focused on advanced order types and pro-trader UX.

Binance Wallet logo
Binance Wallet

Binance appears twice on OpenChainBench: the official BNB Chain RPC endpoints it operates (`bsc-dataseed1.binance.org` and siblings, round-robin) and Binance Wallet, its self-custody Web3 wallet, whose in-app swap routes through one router contract on BNB Chain, Ethereum and Base and settles on on-chain pools.

Side by side measurements

Trading terminal fill quality 2026: what a swap costs on Axiom, GMGN, FOMO, Photon, Trojan, measured on-chain

Trading

Headline: All chains

ProviderCost per swapTerminal feeNetworkPoolFailed swaps
Axiom371 bps89.2 bps7.41 bps118 bps3.66%
Binance Wallet278 bps38.2 bps10.7 bps168 bps4.57%
View
Axiomn/aBinance Walletn/a

Random sample (1,000 a day per Solana row, 6,000 per EVM row) of the swaps each terminal routed, every attempt counted for the fail rate. Reference = the pool's state before the swap (its reserves, or the previous trade within 60 s); swaps without one keep their split, no loss figure. Published from 50 priced swaps pooled over the product's chains at 25 or more (a single-chain product from 25), ranked from 100; the median's 95 % interval is in the JSON. Compare medians, not single swaps.

Trading terminal execution quality 2026: what a swap costs once the app's own fee is removed

Trading

Headline: All chains

ProviderExecution lossCost per swap, all inApp feeNetworkPool
Axiom287 bps370 bps89.2 bps7.41 bps118 bps
Binance Wallet220 bps277 bps38.2 bps10.7 bps168 bps
View
Axiomn/aBinance Walletn/a

Same sample, window and reference as bench 268; read that page for how a swap is priced. Here each swap's loss has the terminal's fee subtracted before the median is taken. Subtracting the two published medians gives a different number wherever an app's fee varies across its own swaps, which is why this is measured, not derived. A swap reads negative when a fee was rebated or the reference drifted the user's way; those stay in. Compare medians with their intervals, never single swaps.

Frequently asked questions

Axiom vs Binance Wallet: which one is better?

Axiom and Binance Wallet are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Binance Wallet leads on Trading terminal fill quality 2026. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Axiom or Binance Wallet?

On the Trading terminal fill quality 2026 benchmark, Binance Wallet leads at 278 bps versus Axiom at 371 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Axiom vs Binance Wallet comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.