Axiom leads on all 3 live benchmarks. Axiom wins on Trading app daily volume 2026 ($129.86M vs $1.57M), Trading terminal fill quality 2026 (420 bps vs 504 bps), Trading terminal execution quality 2026 (335 bps vs 406 bps). Data as of 2026-10-06 UTC.
Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
Axiom is a Solana-native trading terminal expanding to Hyperliquid perps with a registered builder code, focused on advanced order types and pro-trader UX.
Volume is what each app's DeFiLlama adapter attributes to the app per UTC day, over every chain the adapter covers: FOMO is Solana only on DeFiLlama, GMGN spans ten chains. Each row ends on the app's latest closed day: most adapters are Dune queries that publish a day 10 to 20 hours after it closes, so before mid-day UTC some rows are dated one day behind, and GMGN's adapter skips some days. DeFiLlama can restate the last day for about a day; the series is re-read hourly.
Random sample (150 a day per row, Solana and EVM alike) of the swaps each terminal routed, every attempt counted for the fail rate. Reference = the pool's state before the swap (its reserves, or the previous trade within 60 s); swaps without one keep their split, no loss figure. Published from 50 priced swaps pooled over the product's chains at 25 or more (a single-chain product from 25), ranked from 100; the median's 95 % interval is in the JSON. Compare medians, not single swaps.
Same sample, window and reference as bench 268; read that page for how a swap is priced. Here each swap's loss has the terminal's fee subtracted before the median is taken. Subtracting the two published medians gives a different number wherever an app's fee varies across its own swaps, which is why this is measured, not derived. A swap reads negative when a fee was rebated or the reference drifted the user's way; those stay in. Compare medians with their intervals, never single swaps.
Frequently asked questions
Axiom vs Bloom: which one is better?
Axiom and Bloom are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Axiom leads on Trading app daily volume 2026. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher daily volume, Axiom or Bloom?
On the Trading app daily volume 2026 benchmark, Axiom leads at $129.86M versus Bloom at $1.57M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Axiom vs Bloom comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.