Axiom vs Phantom

Name: Axiom vs Phantom OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Phantom leads on the only live benchmark. Phantom wins on Average swap size on Solana ($48.65 vs $44.68).

Read methodology Last measured Fri, 14 Aug 2026 21:39:58 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Axiom

Axiom is a Solana-native trading terminal expanding to Hyperliquid perps with a registered builder code, focused on advanced order types and pro-trader UX.

Phantom

Side by side measurements

Average swap size on Solana: pump.fun vs GMGN vs Fomo vs Axiom, live

Trading

Axiom

Trails

$44.68

p99: $44.68
rank: #9
samples: 1,677,040

Phantom

Leads

$48.65

p99: $48.65
rank: #8
samples: 156,275

Average swap size is computed as 24h attributed volume divided by 24h attributed trade count from Mobula lighthouse. Both numerator and denominator include bot and MEV activity; the metric reflects all on-chain swaps attributed to each platform, not human-only trades. pump.fun volume comes from the byLaunchpad bucket (bonding-curve swaps via pump.fun's own frontend); all other platforms come from byPlatform. Attribution is mutually exclusive per Mobula's referral-tag methodology.

Frequently asked questions

Axiom vs Phantom: which one is better?

Axiom and Phantom are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Phantom leads on Average swap size on Solana. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Axiom or Phantom?

On the Average swap size on Solana benchmark, Phantom leads at $48.65 versus Axiom at $44.68. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Axiom vs Phantom comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

Axiom vs Phantom Perps

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.