Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more
BlockchainsBase
Trails1.96 s
- p99
- 2.98 s
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 42,658
Robinhood Chain
Leads81 ms
- p99
- 199 ms
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 856,335
Base leads on 1 of 4 shared benchmarks, Robinhood Chain on 3. Base wins on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.000314 vs $0.0133). Robinhood Chain wins on Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more (81 ms vs 1.96 s), Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (17.5 min vs 24.0 min), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (24.22 s vs 59.68 s).
Coinbase-operated optimistic rollup on the OP Stack. 2-second sequencer block time, shared bridge with Optimism via the OP Superchain, fastest-growing L2 by TVL since 2024.
Robinhood is a US commission-free investing app with 25M+ funded accounts. It added crypto trading in 2018, launched its own L2 chain (Robinhood Chain) in 2025, and is the #1 most-reviewed financial app on the US App Store with nearly 5 million ratings.
Base
Trails1.96 s
Robinhood Chain
Leads81 ms
Base
Leads$0.000314
Robinhood Chain
Trails$0.0133
Base
Trails24.0 min
Robinhood Chain
Leads17.5 min
Base
Trails59.68 s
Robinhood Chain
Leads24.22 s
Base and Robinhood Chain are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Base leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains. Robinhood Chain leads on Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains benchmark, Base leads at $0.000314 versus Robinhood Chain at $0.0133. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more benchmark, Robinhood Chain leads at 81 ms versus Base at 1.96 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.