BNB vs Internet Computer

BNB leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Internet Computer on 1. BNB wins on Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live wall-clock measurement per chain (0.74 s vs 0.93 s), Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost per L1 chain ($0.0172 vs $0.6724). Internet Computer wins on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across L1 and L2 chains ($0.000240 vs $0.000670). Data as of 2026-11-14 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
BNB logo
BNB

Proof-of-Staked-Authority L1 with 21 active validators rotating per epoch. Probabilistic finality reached after roughly 2 blocks. Block time around 3 seconds.

Internet Computer logo
Internet Computer

The Internet Computer: subnets of nodes run canister smart contracts and sign state with chain-key cryptography; ICP pays ledger fees and is converted into cycles for compute.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

BNB vs Internet Computer: which one is better?

BNB and Internet Computer are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. BNB leads on Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live wall-clock measurement per chain. Internet Computer leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across L1 and L2 chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, BNB or Internet Computer?

On the Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live wall-clock measurement per chain benchmark, BNB leads at 0.74 s versus Internet Computer at 0.93 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, BNB or Internet Computer?

On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across L1 and L2 chains benchmark, Internet Computer leads at $0.000240 versus BNB at $0.000670. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the BNB vs Internet Computer comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.